3."I believe the selection procedure of this company is a nightmare. They recently got me an assistant who is maybe the least proper person for this job. I saw the personality test and reports they use in the selection. It asks and values if a candidate is disciplined, outgoing, talkative, well organized and good with rules. But to tell the truth does are characteristics that I and the job wouldn't want or require. This job requires someone who would be happy not to talk to anyone and write codes for long hours. Who is very creative, imaginative and out of the box. Who can read and learn. Who sometimes can go beyond the rules. I guess they ask for the wrong things because they never asked me (the only person who is an expert on this in this firm) what this job really requires. They want someone who is good with the culture and values of the firm yes I understand this, but what about the nature of the tasks here? At last, the assistant will be working with computers and robots, not the managers. I saw in his file that he worked as a senior developer before but I am sure no company would give him that position with that capacity on that age. But did they search for it? No. Nobody knows if it is true or not. But anyway I saw the candidates and I guess the problem is bigger no good candidates wants to work here, they were all bad." Assuming the things said by the employee are true. Which of the following is TRUE given the case? * (2 points) The company looked for introversion but the employee believes they should have looked for conscientiousness The company looked for person-organization fit more than they did for person-job fit The company looked for person-job fit more than they did for person-organization fit The company looked for introversion but the employee believes they should have looked for agreableness